JV and THE BIG CATS


Home

Mission

Founder: John Varty

Tiger Canyons
Tiger Experiment
Invest in Tigers
Tiger Canyons tigers

Tiger Anatomy

Tourism

Volunteers
Merchandise
Research
JV Image Library
JV's Music

JV's Films

Poaching

Tiger Conservation

Tiger Subspecies

Tiger Newsletters

Tiger Photo Gallery

Contact us


 

 


Select newsletter in right column

 

Newsletter 76
05/09/13

Zoochosis


Corbett with siblings, Sariska and Panna

Look into the eyes of a caged tiger and you will see the zombie victim of 'zoochosis': A passionate plea by conservationist who breeds big cats to return them to wild

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2388943/Look-eyes-caged-tiger-zombie-victim-zoochosis-A-passionate-plea-conservationist-breeds-big-cats-return-wild.html

By Damian Aspinall

PUBLISHED: 22:05 GMT, 10 August 2013 | UPDATED: 08:19 GMT, 23 August 2013

People rarely travelled far, hardly ever abroad, so imagine their delight when they visited menageries filled with chimpanzees, oryx and orangutans.

I can also understand why so many of you today want to take your children to see an elephant or giraffe or gorilla close up.

But I think the time has come to re-evaluate the role of zoos. I know it’s not practical to close all zoos today. Nor am I suggesting that all zoos can be closed tomorrow. But I am proposing that we phase them out over the next 20 to 30 years. 

If you are going to the zoo today, I urge you to look closely. 

In the wild, these creatures roam hundreds of miles. They hunt their prey, raise their offspring and enjoy complex social relationships. So think how it must feel to be locked up with no stimulation, no room to move and no chance of freedom.

Little wonder they develop self-destructive behaviours known as ‘zoochosis’ – repetitively walking in tight circles, rocking, swaying and sometimes mutilating themselves. 

Watch the lion or the tiger. See if it pads back and forth across its pen  .  . .  back and forth  .  . .  back and forth.

Zoos proudly announce millions spent on new enclosures – approximately £130 million has been spent in Europe over the past few years. Imagine the projects they could have funded in the wild for that amount. And nearly all these enclosures are designed for the benefit of the public, not the animals.

All too often they are left on permanent display with nowhere to hide. They have no shade,  little shelter, no privacy at all. For all the money spent, the life of a zoo animal is no different now from what it was almost two centuries ago. All this suffering, for what? Nothing more than our own amusement. That is hard to stomach.

Before I am accused of hypocrisy, let me set out my stall. I'm involved in two wildlife parks in Kent, Howletts and Port Lympne, which have gorillas, rhinos,  elephants and other wildlife. The public pay a fee to see them. This money is for the animals’ upkeep and to help fund the Aspinall Foundation, a conservation initiative to return captive-bred animals to the wild.

I’m proud we have now bred more captive animals – and reintroduced them to the wild – than any other organisation in the world.

Our aim is to get  these animals back  to the wild and bolster the indigenous populations of endangered species. That is the only reason we breed and keep them. I hope that one day that reason will no longer exist. My greatest achievement would be to close Howletts and Port Lympne for good.

Because we are in the countryside we can give our animals more space –- not enough, but it’s an improvement on urban zoos. We also have a strict ethos. The animals come first, not the public. Almost all zoos, I’m afraid, have a different approach. Why else have penguin shows and sea lion hour? How can anybody say that is in the best interest of the  animals’ mental welfare?

Zoos were first designed as businesses. In the 1960s, as our awareness of animal welfare grew, there was a pressure to improve and modernise. Zoos began breeding programmes to protect endangered species and claimed they were there to encourage children to develop an interest in the natural world. 

That is blatant nonsense. After all, we manage to teach children about the Greeks and Romans.   

We should be teaching our children that animals have as much right to live with dignity as we do. By taking them to the zoo we teach them the opposite.

Another argument is that zoos are there for everyone – only the rich can afford a safari.

I don’t buy that line. Today, we can see life in the wild as never before. We can watch the amber eyes of the hawk and its slow wing beats as it prepares to swoop on its prey. We can watch the lioness, fur bristling, as she scans the savannah for predators, protecting her young.

Day in, day out, on television, we can witness these creatures in a way that would have astonished our ancestors. So why are we still resorting to the same form of entertainment they had nearly 200 years ago?

Nowadays, zoos say they are in the business of conservation. In my opinion, that’s a lie. They are in the conservation of business.

Take their breeding programmes. Even when zoos do breed successfully it is not with the aim of reintroducing animals to their natural habitat. Their interest is in ensuring they have a captive population  .  .  .  and when that captive population gets too large they put their animals on the pill to control numbers.  

I think it is now time to take  a leap forward. If zoos are really being honest with the public about their motives, why are 75 per cent of the animals they keep not even endangered?

So what’s the answer? Obviously we can’t change the mentality of ‘zoo-ocracies’ overnight. Like any bureaucracy, they do not desire change or see a way forward.

We must find a new path. I suggest that over the next 20 years we phase out the keeping of species that are not endangered or rare. That would free up more space for the species that need our protection.

The real fight for species’ survival will be won or lost in the wild. But how much do zoos contribute to projects that protect natural habitat, tackle endemic poaching and reintroduce  animals back into the wild? 

THEY say they contribute but since they don’t have to publish figures, there is no way for us  to know. I believe there must be absolute transparency on this issue. And I also think any  institution that keeps animals  in captivity should be taxed a levy of approximately ten to 15 per cent for reinvestment in  in-situ projects.

And any new enclosures where substantial amounts of money are to be invested must be  analysed properly by a regulatory body to prove that the designs are for the benefit of the animals and not the public.

At Howletts and Port Lympne we have animals that can’t breed any more, that aren’t endangered and our enclosures can’t ever be big enough. But we’re brave enough to admit those failings. Zoos must be honest enough to do the same.

Change can only be led by us as individuals. I understand why many of you might be thinking of taking your children to just such a place today. There’s a certain nostalgia – many of us were taken by our parents or grandparents – and a misguided belief that zoos are a respectable form of entertainment. 

But the truth is they’re not. Just look into the eyes of a caged tiger and tell me otherwise.


JV's Response:

Hello Friends

I agree entirely with Damien Aspinall. The recent decision to not allow elephants in zoos should be the first step in phasing out zoos completely.

The decision by countries world wide to not allow animals in circus acts should be implemented immediately.

When the fences were washed away in 2011 at Tiger Canyons, I was forced to bring Corbett into a boma 200m by 200m. The alternative was to leave him to be killed by Seatao. However, Corbett was wild born and wild raised and then confined to captivity. The decision haunts me daily.

By December 2013, Corbett will gain his freedom once again, as the expansion of Tiger Canyons is complete.

I am counting down the days to freedom.

Tread Lightly on the Earth
JV


As Rhino Poaching Surges, South Africa Proposes Legalized Trade in Precious Horns

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/extinction-countdown/2013/07/12/rhino-horn-south-africa-legalized/

By John R. Platt, July 12, 2013

The South African government released two important and shocking news items last week. The first announcement revealed that 461 rhinos had been poached in the country to date as of July 3—more than were killed in all of 2011. Poachers target the animals for their horns, which are valued in China and Vietnam for their purported (but nonexistent) medicinal qualities. The second announcement was a proposal for the legalization of rhino-horn trade, which is currently illegal under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES).

The announcements came from Edna Molewa, South Africa’s Minister of Water and Environmental Affairs, who said she will formally make the proposal at the 2016 meeting of CITES delegates (known as the Convention of the Parties or COP), which will take place in South Africa that year. Molewa praised her country’s efforts to conserve rhinos—a true success story, as both African species were nearly wiped out a few decades ago—while saying that this success has also made the animals targets for criminal gangs. “South Africa cannot continue to be held hostage by the syndicates slaughtering our rhinos,” she said in a prepared statement to the media, adding that a “well-regulated trade system” would help all future conservation efforts.

South Africa reportedly will not seek a full legalization of all rhino-horn trade but a one-time sale of current stockpiles. The South African government has stockpiled more than 16,400 kilograms of rhino horns—mostly confiscated from poachers—while private owners possess about 2,000 kilograms more—ironically, mostly horns that have been removed from live animals to make them less attractive to poachers. With rhino horns fetching anywhere from $10,000 to $40,000 a kilogram, the South African government could net half a billion dollars or more from the proposed sale. Private ranchers, who own much of South Africa’s rhino population, would also benefit from this windfall. In fact, many ranchers have been pushing for a sale like this.

South Africa’s deputy director general for biodiversity, Fundisile Mketeni, said monies from the one-off sale “should go to conservation”—note that he didn’t say it would—but experts and conservation organizations say the sale would do little more than feed the growing desire for rhino horns and make the situation much, much worse in the long run.

History backs them up on this point. Similar one-off sales of ivory to Japan in 1999 and China in 2008 have been linked to the resultant increased demand for ivory in Asia, which has driven elephant poaching across Africa to crisis proportions in the past decade. At the time, proponents of those sales said flooding the market with stockpiled ivory would lower prices and therefore eliminate the incentive to poach more elephants. The opposite happened and prices soared. South Africa now argues that putting more than 18,000 kilograms of rhino horn up for sale would glut the market, lower prices and save more rhinos. This is an argument we have heard before.

Meanwhile, any legal rhino horn market only supports the misconception that this keratinous body part has medicinal qualities. In China and especially Vietnam rhino horn powder is sold as a cancer cure and an after-party drug to remove hangovers. Rhino horns have no such abilities. Why support the misplaced economic value of something that has no practical function for humans, and why support the utterly false belief that rhino horn could cure desperately sick people of their cancer? As WildAid Executive Director Peter Knights wrote on the organization’s blog, “Legitimizing and promoting demand for rhino horn would inevitably create a far larger consumer base and once this genie is out we could never re-cork the bottle if the experiment went wrong.”

And while South Africa may be home to 73 percent of the world’s rhinos, will consumers care if their rhino horn powder is sustainably sourced, which species it comes from or if it originates from South Africa? Poachers don’t care: they’ll target the animals that are easiest to kill and yield the biggest profits, so they’ll take whatever animals they can get. A renewed rhino-horn trade could increase the threats against the Sumatran rhino, which now numbers fewer than 275 animals, or the Javan rhino, which has fewer than 50 surviving members of its species. Those species can’t handle any increase in poaching levels.

So, would legalizing rhino horn trade put an end to poaching? I doubt it. Putting a “well-regulated trade system” in place would probably take years and high levels of international cooperation. Meanwhile the criminal mechanisms already exist to poach and smuggle rhino horn and it seems highly doubtful that they would transition to a legal system; instead, they would continue to kill and smuggle through existing channels while the news that rhino horns were about to become legal served to increase their market.

South Africa is obviously desperate to protect its rhinos. Poaching hurts not just animals but people, and dozens of guards and rangers have been murdered protecting the rhinos in their charge. Guarding and protecting every rhino is next to impossible, as most live in gigantic national parks or wide-ranging reserves. Corruption exists at every level, from guards and police who take bribes from poachers to veterinarians who provide the drugs used to take down rhinos.

Legalizing rhino horn, however, does not appear to be the answer. Instead, the international community needs to target the consumer demand for rhino horn and end it. Rhino horns are useless to every human but they are essential for rhinos, which use them to defend themselves and root up food. Eliminating the market for rhino horns is the only way we’re going to ensure the long-term survival of these threatened species.

One last note: in the eight days after the legalization announcement an additional 19 rhinos were killed in South Africa, bringing this year’s total to 480. Only 140 people have been arrested for the crimes so far this year.


JV's Response:

People have phoned me congratulating me on the South African Government's decision to open the trade in rhino horn. I don't see it as a cause for celebration. The fact that the rhino has to pay its way into the future via the trade of its horn, is an indictment against the human species. The trade in rhino horn is in my opinion, the best of several bad options and I congratulate the South African Government on their bold decision.

However, I query the fact that the Government must wait until 2016 to implement. Surely a special meeting of CITES can be called. This is a major crisis and South Africa has 95% of the rhinos. By 2016, several thousand rhinos could be dead at the present rate of poaching.

The article makes several valid points. What will be the effect on the last of the Javan and Sumatran rhino? We don't know! What we do know is the present situation is catastrophic and we have to change.

The onus is now on every one of us rhino owners who are in possession of rhino horn to support the SA Government by trading responsibly through controlled auctions.

I challenge the private enterprise to make the considerable investment in rhino horn cloning and turn it into a billion dollar profitable business and then plough the funds back into conservation and by extension, protection of the rhino.

Tread lightly on the earth
JV


Response

Dear JV, 

I read your newsletters since I have visited you and your project in 2008. Most of them are quite interesting. I do not always have the same opinion as you but this time I think I have to reply for the first time. Of course there are always at least to sides of every story and the attitude towards zoos can differ. There are several pros and cons and every one has to balance them and take his own decision. However, some statements are not correct from my point of view. I do not know Damian Aspinall but how can you compare to see a real animal with watching a film? Do you have no plants in your house just because it is so easy to get the most beautiful pictures of flowers? Can such a picture substitute the plant in your house? Do you have no garden but a video-installation with changing pictures of the jungle? Do you tell your children not to go out and play football but rather watch TV because the professional players can do much better and can be seen from any perspective? Do you live in front of a computer because google has it all instead of going out? Probably not. I am quite sure that reality cannot be substituted by digital media. Yes, they can intensify our senses but without reality we will never feel a real passion for nature and in turn will not protect it. I do go to zoos with my two year old twins and they love it. I let them interact with pets. I let them ride on a horse (if you can call it that way with two years). I do hardly never show them films, however. And I know that animals will play a role in their live when they are grown ups. That is important to educate them in a way that they will protect our nature one day.

It is not correct that zoos play a minor role in conservation. The entrance fees you state that could be used for other purposes would not be available without zoos. So your idea doesn't lead anywhere. Think of the Frankfurt zoological society and call in mind that Serengeti would probably not exist any more without Frankfurt zoo. This is only one of the uncountable projects that are not only supported but carried by zoos. Of course there are bad zoos and yes, especially the leopards have not the best enclosures in most zoos. Tigers and lions are much more relevant for the visitors and therefore they can get the more expensive enclosures. Zoos do a lot against zoochosis and I wonder quite often how animals would choose if they could. A life in free nature, in a zoo, as a pet. What is best? Compared with humans probably most think that roaming free is best. But this is only the romantic idea we have of it. How many people realy chose such a life? Most individuals chose the burgois annoying life with a retirement arrangement. And that it why I am not sure if sometimes the life in a zoo - even if it is not the life the animals were designed for - is the preferable one. Humans also changed their lifes in a way that has not much to do with what they were designed for from evolutionary aspects. 

Kind regards and see you one day when our children are older 

Joe


JV

A couple of things

·         In SA only 10% of the population have been to a Park

·         Only 80% have access to TV, only 36% to Dstv

·         How many Zoo’s worldwide have closed down over the last 10 years?

·         How do you connect ordinary people with wild animals who will never visit a park with the wild? TV is not the answer, its surreal.

·         A think a case can be made for a bit of ‘reverse psychology’ when one visits a zoo one could become intensely aware of the ‘suffering’, it stimulates a conservation consciousness, an interest to visit a park when you can, a commitment to take up the cause.

·         Zoo’s also facilitate green areas. If they are closed hopefully a park will replace.

Best
Steuart Pennington


 

 

Tread lightly on the Earth

info@jvbigcats.co.za
Copyright 2007 @jvbigcats  All rights reserved


Newsletters


Newsletters 148
09/08/17
Open letter re schools plus Panna cubs

Newsletters 147
17/07/17
It's Finished

Newsletters 146
31/05/17
Hunters

Newsletter 145
20/05/17
King Corbett

Newsletter 144
08/05/17
Hunting versus Non Hunting

Newsletter 143
14/03/17
If it Pays, it Stays

Newsletters 142
14/02/17
Best Photographs at
Tiger Canyons

Newsletters 141
16/01/17
Lady Hunters

Newsletter 140
10/12/16
Londolozi and Love

Newsletter 139
23/11/16
Life is Not Fair

Newsletter 138
17/11/16
The Trump Card

Newsletter 137
22/10/16
Most Admired People on the Planet

Newsletters 136
13/10/16
Captive vs Wild

Newsletter 135
08/10/16
To trade  or not To Trade

Newsletter 134
08/08/16
A Defining Moment

Newsletter 133
08/07/16
I Have Lost A Friend

Newsletter 132
13/05/16
The World is Changing

Newsletter 131
08/04/16
Icon Cats

Newsletter 130
31/03/16
Sylvester the Lion

Newsletter 129
22/03/16
An Open Letter to Head United Nations

Newsletter 128
15/03/16
An Open Letter to Carte Blanche

Newsletter 127
28/11/15
Satellite Tracking

Newsletter 126
12/11/15
Lightning strikes 3 times

Newsletter 125
28/10/15
The Break Out

Newsletter 124
05/10/15
Bad Tigers

Newsletter 123
01/10/15
Tiger Boy's Journey

Newsletter 122
13/09/15
Give it a Name

Newsletter 121
10/09/15
Driven Hunts

Newsletter 120
01/09/15
Creative Conservation

Newsletter 119
12/08/15
Sariska from birth till death

Newsletter 118
11/08/15
Real Hunters

Newsletter 117
07/08/15
An Open Letter to the President: Operation Wild Lion

Newsletter 116
03/08/15
An Open Letter to Theo Bronkhorst

Newsletter 115
28/07/15
Cruel Nations

Newsletter 114
08/07/15
Subspecies or no subspecies

Newsletter 113
11/06/15
Tigers Moving Forward

Newsletter 112
13/04/15
Between a Rock and a Hard Place

Newsletter 111
26/03/15
Don't Shoot the Messenger

Newsletter 110
22/03/15
The Hunters

Newsletter 109
09/03/15
Gaia or God?

Newsletter 108
26/02/15
The Healing Power of Cats

Newsletter 107
18/02/15
Goddess Gaia

Newsletter 106
03/02/15
Ambassador Cats

Newsletter 105
24/01/15
Blondes have more fun

Invitation
09/01/15
Gaining ground for tigers

Newsletter 103
14/12/14
Tibo's Dilemma

Newsletter 102
05/12/14
Wilderness Man

Newsletter 101
25/11/14
Sariska fathers cubs with white Tigress Tibo

Newsletter 100
20/11/14
Cheetah Survival

Newsletter 99
30/09/14
Extract from JV's speech on Corbett's Freedom Day

Newsletter 98
15/08/14
The Power of the Picture

Newsletter 97
18/07/14
Tiger Corbett's Release

Newsletter 96
11/07/14
Corbett's Journey

Newsletter 95
18/06/14
Bush School: Where are they now?

Newsletter 94
12/05/14
Open letter to Jani Allen: Oscar Pistorius

Newsletter 93
07/05/14
John Varty interview with Sizie Modise

Newsletter 92
20/04/14
Marion's Big Cat Safari

Newsletter 91
24/02/14
Full energy flow

Newsletter 90
10/02/14
Investing in wild tigers

Newsletter 89
05/02/14
Where are the Champions?

Newsletter 88
27/01/14
Managing the Genes

Newsletter 87
16/01/14
Capture the Moment

Newsletter 86
07/12/13
The Princess Diana of Tigers - Julie:
 Sept 1999 - 5 Des 2013

Newsletter 85
26/11/13
The Communicators

Newsletter 84
26/11/13
A Letter to All Conservationists in SA 
Sparked by the whole Melissa Bachman Debacle
by Maxine Gaines

Newsletter 83
16/11/13
Tell me what happened

Newsletter 82
04/11/13
Profit is the Name of Your Game

Newsletter 81
30/10/13

Big Cat Cub Safari


Newsletter 80
18/10/13
In the Jaws of the Tiger

Newsletter 79
11/10/13
Open letter to Vice President Cyril Ramaphosa about rhino crisis

Newsletter 78
06/10/13
Open letter to Min of Defense, South Africa about rhino crisis

Newsletter 77
30/09/13
Digital Photography

Newsletter 76
06/09/13
Zoochosis

Newsletter 75
20/07/13
Rhino Horn Trade - Response

Newsletter 74
09/07/13
Raw Power

Newsletter 73
02/07/13
The Evolution of the Tracker

Newsletter 72
02/07/13
An Open Letter to the Honourable Edna Molewa, Minister of Water Affairs and Environmental Affairs

Newsletter 71
06/06/13
Using flash or spotlight on cats at night

Newsletter 70
14/05/13
Mirror mirror on the wall, who has the best eyesight of them all?

Newsletter 69
12/04/13
Mirror, mirror on the wall, who is the fastest of them all?

Newsletter 68
25/03/13
Mirror, mirror on the wall, who is the best fighter of them all?

Newsletters 67
07/03/13
Wild Cheetah return to the Free State after 100 years

Newsletter 66
28/02/13
Seeking the genes

Newsletters 65
06/02/13
Corbett's Journey

Newsletters 64
22/01/13
In Search of a Mate

Newsletters 63
11/01/13
Rumble in the Jungle

Newsletters 62
30/10/12
Voronin Big Cat Safari Breaks All Records

Newsletters 61
09/12/12
A Journey to Nowhere

Newsletter 60
03/10/12
The John Hume Approach

Newsletter 59
28/09/12
Response to Rhino Horn Auction

Newsletters 58
24/09/12
A Letter to John Hume, SA biggest Rhino Breeder

Newsletters 57
05/09/12
Newsletters 56
01/08/12
Indian Government -
the wrong decision

Newsletter 55
11/07/12
What price must beauty pay?

Newsletter 54
21/04/12
Corbett's Freedom

Newsletter 53
15/04/12
Lethal injection or Freedom

Newsletters 52
04/04/12
The anatomy of an aggressive tiger

Newsletters 51
14/02/12
Majestic, breathtaking pictures

Newsletters 50
04/11/11
Tigress Calendar

Newsletters 49
19/11/11

Let your pictures do the talking

Newsletters 48
26/09/11

Rhino Wars

Newsletters 47
06/09/11
A Letter to the President

Newsletters 46
08/08/11
The Body Parts Scam

Newsletters 45
11/07/11
Tiger Subspecies

Newsletters 43
01/05/11
Your future and the Tiger

Newsletter 42
08/05/11
Talk to Me

Newsletter 41
26/01/11
Gaian Reminder

Newsletter 40
18/11/10
Ron's Journey

Newsletter 39
20/10/10
"Descreprimate"

Newsletter 38
06/09/10
Beauty comes at a price

Newsletter 37
18/08/10

The Light Has Gone Out


Newsletter 36
08/07/10
The Beautiful Game

Newsletter 35
05/07/10
The Ethics of
Tiger Green Hunting

Newsletter 34
21/06/10
Tiger Hunt

Newsletter 33
26/05/10
The Year of the Tiger

Newsletter 32
11/02/10

Riding the Tiger


Newsletter 31
24/01/10

Runti's Journey


Newsletter 30
12/01/10

To intervene or not to intervene -
that is the question...

Newsletter 29
07/12/09

Lion - Tiger - Human Communication


Newsletter 28
12/11/09

Emotional humans, emotional cats


Newsletter 27
03/11/09

Julie gives birth to 5 tiger cubs


Newsletter 26
24/09/09

International Tiger Day


Newsletter 25
17/08/09

To all Photographers


Newsletter 24
16/07/09

A Shot in Anger


Newsletter 22
24/04/09


Newsletter 21
24/03/09


Newsletter 19
14/01/09

Tiger Birth
at Tiger Canyons


Newsletter 16
10/10/08

Tiger Courting


Newsletter 11
29/01/08

Privatizing the Tiger


Newsletter 9
27/10/07

Newsletter 8
28/09/07

Newsletter 7
14/09/07

Water Cats


Newsletter 6
14/08/07

Tiger Intelligence


Newsletter 5
16/05/07

Tiger language
Tiger Boma


Newsletter 3
09/03/07

Interspecies communication


Newsletter 2
06/02/07

Cub relocation


Londolozi
Newsletters

Death of a Legend
17/08/09


Newsletter 20
10/02/09

Newsletter 15
17/08/08

Painted Wolves


Newsletter 13
11/04/08

Response to Elephant Trust
by Daryl Balfour


Newsletter 12
09/04/08

Elephant Trust